The areas of expertise that MK LAW SOLICITORS LTD offers, and how many other firms on ReviewAsolicitor also cover each one.
Practice Area
Firms in London
Firms nationally
Criminal Defence All
620
3,173
Reviews
Verified reviews imported from Google
Filter:
R
Razvan Matei
Review left 4 months ago Verified
Probably one of the best Law firm in UK, my case was quite complex and the odds were against me, however my solicitor miss Alison Marks came up with a brilliant strategy worth of Hollywood movies.
Absolutely brilliant strategy and outcome, outstanding services.
I strongly recommend MK Law services to everyone.
And a massive thank you to the office team at MK Law, everyone who was involved ,and specially a big Thank You to Alison Marks.
Absolutely brilliant and professional.
Thank you Alison
W
Worldwide Visa
Review left 4 months ago Verified
⚠️ Warning: Many of this firm’s positive reviews seem fake our experience tells a very different story.
Communication was poor, a simple case was badly mismanaged, dragged out, and deadlines were missed, including failing to appear in court on time.
As a legal-aid criminal law firm, tight funding and staffing may affect performance, but our experience showed a serious lack of organisation and accountability.
It’s worth noting that legal-aid solicitors often face very challenging conditions. Many rely heavily on government funding to stay in business, which can create resource shortages, high caseloads, and performance issues. While funding constraints are understandable, in our experience this firm’s handling of the case showed a level of mismanagement and poor communication that went far beyond what should be acceptable.
D
Devika
Review left 4 months ago Verified
My experience with MK Law Solicitors was extremely poor and caused unnecessary stress over an already serious criminal matter.
Over 18 months, my case was handled by four trainees: Mia, Terisa, Lauryn and Rebecca. At no stage did I have consistent oversight from a qualified solicitor, despite initial assurances from Oliver Dean that I would receive proper representation.
Mia built a defence strategy around my second charge while failing to properly review my medical records, the firm had access to them from day one, and they contained clear proof of my innocence. Instead of identifying this, I was asked to gather excessive and unnecessary additional material for nearly a year. The key evidence was there from the start. It was simply not reviewed.
When I raised concerns about the handling of my case to Oliver Dean, I felt dismissed. I was swiftly reassigned to Terisa, who repeatedly defended Mia’s work and insisted I continue including her in email correspondence despite the breakdown in trust. This was unprofessional. Internal supervision issues should not be placed on the client.
Communication throughout was inconsistent. Calls were missed. Delays were common. Coursework commitments were cited as reasons for unavailability by Terisa. As a client facing serious charges, I do not expect my case to compete with trainee coursework.
Due to poor case management, my matter was adjourned. This prolonged the process unnecessarily and left me in extended physical, emotional and financial stress.
The day before my rearranged court date, at approximately 4:30pm, I received a call from another trainee, Rebecca, informing me that the barrister from my first hearing would no longer be attending and that someone else would be stepping in. This was communicated at the last minute, with no prior discussion, preparation, or reassurance. There was no evident care or strategic planning.
At no point was I properly advised on how I would be questioned in court or how to prepare for cross-examination. I received no meaningful counsel on courtroom strategy. I was left to gather key evidence myself and effectively build my own defence.
Had I relied entirely on the firm’s handling of the case, the outcome would have been severely damaging to my life.
Based on my experience, there was a clear lack of consistent supervision, preparation and accountability. I cannot recommend this firm to anyone facing serious criminal proceedings.
I would recommend avoiding at all costs.
S
Sherena Joyram
Review left 5 months ago Verified
Hesham Puri and his team supported me throughout my complex court case, and I am extremely satisfied with the outcome. They were understanding, transparent at every stage, and provided full support throughout the entire process. I didn’t realise how much I needed MK Law until I met the team. Would highly recommend their services.
W
W H
Review left 9 months ago Verified
I cannot give a higher recommendation for Duncan Burtwell and MK Law. We received the highest level of professionalism and efficiency that you would expect from solicitors, but Duncan also took the time, showed patience, and demonstrated empathy to ensure that we were always well informed, confident, and comfortable with each step we were going through. Duncan has been an absolute pleasure to work with, and I will be sure to return to him in the future if I require his services. Thank you so much.